Skip to content
type1.science

Ladarixin (CXCR1/CXCR2 blockade)

What it is

An oral immune-pathway inhibitor tested soon after T1D diagnosis. The latest Phase 2 trial stopped for futility; results posted in August 2026 did not establish beta-cell preservation.

Editorial review: . What was checked and what remains uncertain.

Latest dated source in the citation list: 2026-08-31. This is the source’s date, not a new review of every claim.

Trial status, labels and access can change between reviews.

Full sources ↓Full discussion ↓Report an issue →

Trial stopped for futilityEarly evidenceladarixinbeta-cell-preservation

Evidence behind this assessment

Key evidence notes. Study results, product eligibility and access answer different questions.

Who was studied?
Study populations and analysis groups vary. Product age limits alone do not describe who was studied.See the linked studies and their populations →
Benefit or performance
Beta-cell preservation: The latest primary analysis included 140 participants and did not show a significant C-peptide advantage (P=0.19582).[1]
Important harms and treatment burden
Safety: Serious events affected 1/94 drug recipients and 1/46 placebo recipients; investigators considered neither related. This small comparison cannot exclude rare harms.[1]
Approval and country access
An oral immune-pathway inhibitor tested soon after T1D diagnosis. The latest Phase 2 trial stopped for futility; results posted in August 2026 did not establish beta-cell preservation.Approval, trial recruitment, local supply and funding are separate. Check the cited label or access source.
Follow-up and remaining uncertainty
Durability: The study stopped for futility; a durable preservation benefit has not been established.[1]

Research status alone does not establish approval, clinical benefit or local availability.

Editorial score: calculation and evidence

A weighted editorial judgment on a 0–100 scale, not a probability of success or a measured treatment effect. Higher criterion scores mean more favorable assessments.

Default calculation: 10 × 30 + 10 × 20 + 50 × 20 + 25 × 10 + 35 × 20 = 2450; divide by total weight 100. Unrounded weighted result: 24.5.

Beta-cell preservation10

The latest primary analysis included 140 participants and did not show a significant C-peptide advantage (P=0.19582).[1]

Durability10

The study stopped for futility; a durable preservation benefit has not been established.[1]

Safety50

Serious events affected 1/94 drug recipients and 1/46 placebo recipients; investigators considered neither related. This small comparison cannot exclude rare harms.[1]

Eligibility breadth25

The later study selected ages 14–45 within 180 days of first insulin, with autoantibodies and residual insulin production.[1]

Maturity35

Randomized Phase 2 results are available, but the latest trial terminated for futility.[1]

The full picture

What was tested

Ladarixin blocks the CXCR1/CXCR2 receptors in the IL-8 inflammatory pathway. An earlier randomized trial assigned 76 adults to drug or placebo. Its 13-week primary C-peptide comparison was not statistically significant (P=0.122). A transient secondary finding does not reverse that primary result.1

The August 2026 result

NCT04628481 is marked terminated for protocol-defined futility, with results posted on 31 August. The registry's total enrolment of 289 includes the run-in population; it is not the randomized treatment analysis denominator. The primary analysis used 94 ladarixin and 46 placebo recipients. The adjusted difference in change in log(AUC + 1) for meal-stimulated C-peptide at six months was −0.133 (95% CI −0.334 to 0.068; P=0.19582). This is a transformed measure, not a percentage difference or an untransformed C-peptide concentration.2

The safety table reports no deaths in either treatment group and one participant with a serious event in each. It does not establish long-term safety. These are sponsor-posted registry results, distinct from the peer-reviewed earlier trial. Neither study supports using ladarixin as a proven cure or an insulin replacement.

Sources

  1. [1]NCT04628481 — study record · registry · 2026-08-31Registry update date; retrieved 16 September 2026. Registry registration is not proof of clinical benefit.
  2. [2]Ladarixin in new-onset type 1 diabetes: randomized placebo-controlled trial · peer-reviewed · 2022-07-04