AVT001 (spHsp60-pulsed autologous dendritic cells)
Avotres
Autologous dendritic cells restoring HLA-E CD8+ Tregs — slowed C-peptide loss at 5 months in a 25-patient Phase 1/2 RCT.
What it is
Autologous immature dendritic cells pulsed ex vivo with an Hsp60 signal peptide (spHsp60) to restore defective HLA-E-restricted CD8+ regulatory T cells; in a 25-patient randomized double-blind Phase 1/2 trial (NEJM Evidence 2024), AVT001 significantly slowed C-peptide decline at Day 150 with zero serious adverse events.
Editorial review: .
Most recent recorded citation date: 2025 (year only). Only explicit date metadata is included; an undated citation may be newer. This does not mean every claim was reviewed on that date.
Trial status, labels and access can change between reviews. How we review the evidence · How to read the evidence
Evidence behind this assessment
Key evidence notes. Study results, product eligibility and access answer different questions.
- Who was studied?
- Study populations and analysis groups vary. Product age limits alone do not describe who was studied.See the linked studies and their populations →
- Benefit or performance
- Beta-cell preservation: In the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1/2 trial (NCT03895996, n=25: 16 AVT001 vs 9 placebo; Gaglia et al., NEJM Evidence 2024), AVT001 preserved 4-hour MMTT C-peptide AUC at Day 150 (mean 0.531 to 0.518 nmol/L [-2.4%] vs 0.611 to 0.472 nmol/L [-22.7%] on placebo; log AUC treatment difference +0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.15), with less decline maintained through Day 360, especially in younger patients with higher baseline C-peptide. Scored in the upper-twenties because the cohort was small (n=25) and C-peptide was a secondary endpoint.[1]
- Important harms and treatment burden
- Safety: Met all primary safety and tolerability endpoints in NCT03895996: zero serious adverse events (0 SAEs), zero local IV-site reactions (0/16), and no hepatic or renal laboratory signals, while avoiding systemic immunosuppression. Requires leukapheresis and three IV infusions.[1]
- Approval and country access
- Country-specific approval and access are not summarized in this record.Approval, trial recruitment, local supply and funding are separate. Check the cited label or access source.
- Follow-up and remaining uncertainty
- Durability: Three monthly intravenous doses given over 60 days maintained a C-peptide advantage through Day 150 and partially through Day 360, but regulatory CD8+ T-cell potency and metabolic separation attenuated after dosing stopped, pointing to a likely need for booster infusions.[1]
Research status alone does not establish approval, clinical benefit or local availability.
Editorial score: calculation and evidence
A weighted editorial judgment on a 0–100 scale, not a probability of success or a measured treatment effect. Higher criterion scores mean more favorable assessments.
Default calculation: 28 × 30 + 18 × 20 + 55 × 20 + 30 × 10 + 26 × 20 = 3120; divide by total weight 100. Unrounded weighted result: 31.2.
In the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1/2 trial (NCT03895996, n=25: 16 AVT001 vs 9 placebo; Gaglia et al., NEJM Evidence 2024), AVT001 preserved 4-hour MMTT C-peptide AUC at Day 150 (mean 0.531 to 0.518 nmol/L [-2.4%] vs 0.611 to 0.472 nmol/L [-22.7%] on placebo; log AUC treatment difference +0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.15), with less decline maintained through Day 360, especially in younger patients with higher baseline C-peptide. Scored in the upper-twenties because the cohort was small (n=25) and C-peptide was a secondary endpoint.[1]
Three monthly intravenous doses given over 60 days maintained a C-peptide advantage through Day 150 and partially through Day 360, but regulatory CD8+ T-cell potency and metabolic separation attenuated after dosing stopped, pointing to a likely need for booster infusions.[1]
Met all primary safety and tolerability endpoints in NCT03895996: zero serious adverse events (0 SAEs), zero local IV-site reactions (0/16), and no hepatic or renal laboratory signals, while avoiding systemic immunosuppression. Requires leukapheresis and three IV infusions.[1]
Because HLA-E is virtually monomorphic across human populations, AVT001 is not restricted to specific HLA-DR/DQ genotypes. However, autologous leukapheresis and custom GMP dendritic-cell manufacturing limit scalability compared with off-the-shelf biologics.[3]
Completed a 25-patient randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1/2 trial with full results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov and peer-reviewed in NEJM Evidence (July 2024), awaiting a larger multi-center Phase 2b trial.[1]
The full picture
Overview
AVT001 is an autologous dendritic cell immunotherapy developed by Avotres Inc. based on foundational immunology research by Drs. Hong Jiang and Leonard Chess at Columbia University (PMID: 20877010). Whereas most regulatory T-cell therapies focus on classical CD4+ Foxp3+ Tregs, AVT001 targets a distinct peripheral self-tolerance checkpoint mediated by non-classical MHC class Ib (Qa-1 in mice / HLA-E in humans)-restricted CD8+ regulatory T cells (HLA-E CD8+ Tregs).
During T-cell activation, intermediate-avidity self-reactive T cells upregulate surface complexes of HLA-E bound to a nine-amino-acid hydrophobic leader peptide derived from heat shock protein 60 (spHsp60). HLA-E-restricted CD8+ Tregs recognize this HLA-E/spHsp60 complex and selectively eliminate or inhibit activated pathogenic autoreactive T cells while sparing low-avidity naive T cells and high-avidity pathogen-specific T cells. In a majority of people with Type 1 Diabetes, this HLA-E CD8+ Treg pathway is functionally defective (PMID: 20877010).
To manufacture AVT001, peripheral blood monocytes are collected from the patient via leukapheresis, differentiated ex vivo into immature dendritic cells, and pulsed with synthetic spHsp60 peptide. Because HLA-E is virtually monomorphic across human populations (with only two functionally similar alleles worldwide), a single standardized spHsp60 peptide works across patients regardless of their classical HLA-DR or HLA-DQ genotype.
Key Clinical Evidence
Randomized Phase 1/2 Trial at Joslin Diabetes Center (NCT03895996, NEJM Evidence 2024)
In the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1/2 trial NCT03895996 (published by Gaglia et al. in NEJM Evidence in July 2024, PMID: 38916421), 25 participants aged 16 and older within 1 year of Stage 3 T1D diagnosis with residual C-peptide were randomized approximately 2:1 to receive three monthly intravenous infusions of AVT001 (n = 16) or matched placebo (n = 9) at Cellular Therapy labs of Dana-Farber / Joslin Diabetes Center, with primary analysis at Day 150 (5 months post-first dose) and supplemental follow-up through Day 360:
- Primary Safety Outcomes: AVT001 met all primary safety endpoints. There were zero serious adverse events (
0 SAEs), zero local intravenous-site reactions (0/16vs0/9), and no clinically meaningful changes in hepatic (ALT-0.1 ± 5.2 U/L, AST-1.9 ± 7.8 U/L, bilirubin-0.11 ± 4.06 µmol/L) or renal (creatinine) laboratory parameters. All 16 AVT001 recipients completed the full Day 360 follow-up (16/16), compared with8/9in the placebo group. - Mechanistic Target Engagement (
HLA-E CD8+ TregPotency Assay): In the functional CD8+ T-cell inhibition assay posted on ClinicalTrials.gov, baselineHLA-E CD8+ Treginhibition in the AVT001 group was defective at-11.2% ± 9.9%and rose to+9.3% ± 24.9%at Day 150, compared with3.5% ± 7.1%at baseline and1.8% ± 15.1%at Day 150 in the placebo group — confirming in vivo restoration of the targeted regulatory pathway. - Metabolic Preservation (4-Hour MMTT C-Peptide AUC):
- On the raw ClinicalTrials.gov results scale (
nmol/L), mean 4-hour MMTT stimulated C-peptide AUC in the AVT001 arm (n = 16) went from0.531 ± 0.363 nmol/Lat baseline to0.518 ± 0.430 nmol/Lat Day 150 (-2.4%mean change), whereas the placebo arm (n = 9) declined from0.611 ± 0.178 nmol/Lat baseline to0.472 ± 0.134 nmol/Lat Day 150 (-22.7%mean decline). - On the prespecified longitudinal mixed-model analysis of log-transformed C-peptide AUC (
PMID: 38916421), the estimated treatment difference in change from baseline to Day 150 favored AVT001 by+0.09(95% CI, 0.03 to 0.15), with less C-peptide decline maintained through Day 360 while both arms targeted standard glycemic control (70–180 mg/dL [3.9–10.0 mmol/L]; Day 150 HbA1c6.15% ± 0.85%in AVT001 vs5.82% ± 0.84%in placebo). - Exploratory subgroup analyses indicated the strongest C-peptide preservation in participants treated earlier with higher baseline C-peptide and lower baseline insulin requirements.
- On the raw ClinicalTrials.gov results scale (
Limitations & Watch Items
- Waning Off-Treatment Effect: Because AVT001 was administered only at Months 0, 1, and 2, the C-peptide trajectory and
CD8+ Tregpotency began to attenuate between Day 150 and Day 360. Future Phase 2b protocols will likely need quarterly or semiannual maintenance booster infusions (readily thawed from cryopreserved aliquots of the initial leukapheresis batch). - Sample Size & Next Trial Registration: While
NCT03895996was randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled,n = 25is an early proof-of-concept sample size; registration of a larger multi-center Phase 2b trial is the key next milestone.
Summary of Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- Targets a non-classical monomorphic MHC class Ib pathway (HLA-E), meaning patients do not need to carry specific classical HLA-DR3 or HLA-DR4 alleles to be eligible
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1/2 trial at Joslin Diabetes Center (NCT03895996, n = 25; Gaglia et al., NEJM Evidence 2024) met its primary safety endpoint (0 SAEs) and demonstrated less decline in 4-hour MMTT C-peptide AUC than placebo at Day 150 (+0.09 log C-peptide AUC difference, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.15; raw mean 0.531 to 0.518 nmol/L [-2.4%] on AVT001 vs 0.611 to 0.472 nmol/L [-22.7%] on placebo)
- Ex vivo functional potency assay confirmed restoration of HLA-E-restricted CD8+ Treg inhibitory activity (+9.3% at Day 150 vs -11.2% at baseline in AVT001 recipients) without systemic immunosuppression
Limitations
- {'Small Phase 1/2 sample size (n = 25': '16 AVT001 versus 9 placebo), and no larger Phase 2b or Phase 3 confirmatory trial has yet begun recruiting on ClinicalTrials.gov'}
- Requires patient-specific leukapheresis, ex vivo monocyte-to-dendritic-cell differentiation and peptide pulsing, and three monthly intravenous infusions
- C-peptide preservation gradually waned after the three monthly infusions ended (between Day 150 and Day 360), indicating that periodic maintenance booster infusions or earlier intervention may be needed for durable disease control
Sources
- [1]Novel Autologous Dendritic Cell Therapy AVT001 for Type 1 Diabetes · Peer-reviewed study · 2024 (year only) — Gaglia JL, Daley HL, Bryant NK, Ritz J, Dong T, Skyler JS, Jiang H (NEJM Evidence 2024). PMID 38916421. DOI 10.1056/EVIDoa2300238. Peer-reviewed primary publication of the randomized double-blind placebo-controlled Phase 1/2 trial (NCT03895996, n=25) at Joslin Diabetes Center.
- [2]A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of AVT001 in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes · Trial registry · 2025 (year only) — Avotres Inc. / Joslin Diabetes Center (ClinicalTrials.gov 2025). Registry NCT03895996. Completed Phase 1/2 study (n=25: 16 AVT001 vs 9 matched placebo) with full primary safety and secondary C-peptide and HLA-E CD8+ Treg potency results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov.
- [3]HLA-E-restricted regulatory CD8(+) T cells are involved in development and control of human autoimmune type 1 diabetes · Peer-reviewed study · 2010 (year only) — Jiang H, Canfield SM, Gallagher MP, Jiang HH, Jiang Y, Zheng Z, Chess L (Journal of Clinical Investigation 2010). PMID 20877010. DOI 10.1172/JCI43522. Foundational Columbia University study demonstrating that most T1D patients have a functional defect in HLA-E-restricted CD8+ Tregs that can be corrected in vitro by spHsp60-pulsed dendritic cells.