Skip to content
type1.science

Editorial review

16 September 2026: what we checked

This review compared the site with evidence available by 16 September 2026, following the 27 August baseline. The notes below record the checks, corrections, sources and unresolved limits for individual items and trials.

Review depth varies. A current registry check can establish registered status, dates and eligibility; it does not verify every historical outcome or establish treatment approval or local access. Some papers were available only as abstracts or metadata. Sponsor announcements and conference reports are identified in the notes and carry different limits from peer-reviewed results.

This is an AI-assisted editorial review, not independent clinical certification. A review date or an unchanged record does not certify every claim. Read the scope and limits alongside the sources; scores remain editorial judgments.

441 of 441 current records have dated review notes. Multiple reviews of one record are shown together. Existing page review dates have not been advanced merely to match this pass.

Find a record · Read the full review reports · Methodology · Changelog

Review notes by record

1–40 of 441 matching records (441 total). A note describes scope, not a verification rating.

Full review reports

These are the underlying dated ledgers, including their review methods and limitations. Their record counts overlap where a study received more than one review.